10 Questions on the Death Penalty (2022)

On 10 October, 2018, the World Day Against the Death Penalty focuses on the living conditions of those sentenced to death.

Death row is typically characterised by these three factors:

- Harsh conditions of detention
- The excessive length of incarceration
- The anguish of living under a death sentence

The typical Egypt death row inmates usually spend their time: isolated from the general prison population and held in solitary confinement size of 1.5mx2m, without a toilet or adequate lighting or ventilation. They are only allowed out of the cell for 15 minutes a day to ‘walk’ and to empty the bucket they use as a toilet, they spend as much as 23 hours and 45 minutes a day alone in their cell in a state of constant uncertainty over when they will be executed.

(Video) Death Penalty & Anti Death Penalty: Is There Middle Ground? | Middle Ground

10 Questions on the Death Penalty

1. Why does Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights oppose the capital punishment?

The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights opposes the death penalty in principle and in all cases without exception as it constitutes a grave violation of human rights, namely the right to life and because of its unique and irreversible nature, if the innocence of the accused is proven later it is impossible to bring the defendants back to life. This has indeed happened in Egypt before in cases were executions were carried out under laws that were subsequently declared unconstitutional. If the conditions for full and impartial justice are difficult or impossible to achieve under the best of circumstances and during times of stability; were the institutions of the state and its organs of the administration of justice operate in an efficient and transparent manner, one can only imagine what the status of justice administration is like in these times when the bare minimum of these conditions are not met.

2. Don’t victims of violent crime and their families have a right to justice?

They do. Those who have lost loved ones in violent crimes have the right to see the person responsible held accountable in a fair trial, and our opposition to the death penalty is not meant to understate the magnitude of such crimes, but there is no evidence that executions bring relief to the families of the victims. Evidence suggests that perhaps the most important factor to families is to know the whole truth and hold accountable everyone who was involved in causing harm to their loved ones. Authorities often resort to death sentences as a false consolation instead of doing the actual work involved in finding the real perpetrators of the crime and sometimes they resort to executions to protect some parties from real accountability .

(Video) 10 Questions: GOP gubernatorial candidates discuss NH's death penalty

3 If you kill someone else, don’t you deserve to die, too ?

The execution of a person for killing another person is an act of revenge and not justice, society and the authorities acting on its behalf should not resort to the same measures used by criminals. The idea of imposing a punishment of the same type of crime is absurd: a rapist is not punished by rape nor is a thief punished by being subjected to theft, and generally it is not acceptable for the justice system to apply vindictive punitive measures that could only lead to an increase of violence within society and exacerbate the original problem.

4. Doesn’t the death penalty prevent crime?

Scientific studies have not found any evidence that capital punishment is a deterrent to crime. On the contrary, many countries have witnessed a marked decline in the rate of murder and violent crime after abolition of capital punishment, such as Canada, for example1. Perpetrators who plan crimes in advance especially are typically acting in the belief that their crime will not be discovered and so are less likely to be deterred by the nature of the punishment rather than the knowledge that a punishment is likely. Deterrence, thus, is more effectively pursued through maximising the efficiency of investigation and ensuring that crimes are consistently solved and punished, rather than through recommending death penalty as a punishment.

5. What about capital punishment for terrorists?

(Video) Lee Kuan Yew Explains Death Penalty For Drug Traffickers In Singapore

The death penalty does not constitute an effective deterrent to terrorism, and it does not seem reasonable that an individual who is prepared to blow himself up to achieve whatever political ends will be deterred by the possibility of execution. In fact, the execution of terrorism suspects is often counterproductive as their supporters elevate them to the ranks of martyrs, whereby their symbolic status and power outlives them and emboldens terrorist groups and their ability to recruit and mobilise based on the desire for revenge and retaliation.

6. Isn’t it better to execute someone than to lock them up forever?

The death penalty is a final and irreversible punishment, thus cutting off the possibility to rectify or redress any wrongdoing if new evidence emerges that may exonerate the accused. It also deprives the accused, if proven guilty, of the opportunity to repent, change his or her course of life and reintegrate into society. The claim that execution can be a effective tool to reduce numbers of prisoners and ease prison capacity and ass ociated costs is inhumane and involves a great deal of disregard for the value of life.

7. Is there a humane and painless way to execute a person?

No. All forms and methods of execution are inhumane. To say that there is a "humane" way to kill people is to try to make the executions appear more acceptable to the public on whose behalf the execution is carried out and to make the governments that carry out the punishment seem less criminal than the killers themselves. It should also be noted that the exceptional cruelty of the punishment is not limited to the moment of execution or its method, but extends to the waiting period of the condemned who live in constant fear of being killed at any moment.

(Video) 10 Questions with Tim | Death Penalty, Infertility, False Teachers, Predestination, Depression ...

8 . What if public opinion is in favour of the death penalty?

To many observers it seems that capital punishment enjoys wide support and approval among the Egyptian public, and many see it as a decisive and radical solution to all forms of political and criminal deviation and almost as a magical tool to uproot societal evil. The fact of the matter is that this issue has not been adequately debated and our society has not had the opportunity to identify and address its many problematic aspects. There are many factors that underlie the process of executing someone, which often remain incomprehensible and unknown to the public. These include the risk of the execution of an innocent person, the failure to ensure fair trial procedures, and the discriminatory nature of this punishment.

9. Is the battle to abolish the death penalty being won on a global level?

Yes, there is a growing global trend towards the abolition of the death penalty. The number of states that abolished the death penalty for all crimes is currently 104 representing more than 70% of the states of the world, including Djibouti (a member of the League of Arab States); the only Arab, Islamic state to have abolished the penalty. This is in addition to seven states that abolished the penalty for ordinary criminal offenses, leaving the possibility of death sentence for exceptional circumstances only.
On the other hand, ten other countries abolished the death penalty through practice, meaning they have suspended implementation for more than ten years, including five Arab states: Algeria, Morocco, Mauritania, the Union of the Comoros and Tunisia. This leaves a minority of 57 countries around the world that still apply the death penalty

10. Does the abolition of the death penalty conflict with religious laws and beliefs?

(Video) The Death Penalty Debate

In general, all religions call for tolerance and are in favour of forgiveness/reprieve over retaliation. It is widely believed that the abolition of the punishment conflicts with Islamic law. On the contrary, the conditions necessary to prove a crime warranting “qisas”, the concept most frequently cited by those who advocate for retaining capital punishment in order to remain faithful to the tenants of sharia; those conditions almost guarantee that the death penalty is rarely carried out. There are only two ways to prove a crime warranting qisas: the testimony of direct, trustworthy witnesses or the confession of the accused person. For the former, the testimonies must be consistent with each other in their most minute detail, and any inconsistency renders the testimonies void. For the latter condition, the accused must confess before a judge, and there must be guarantees that confessions were not obtained under duress or under any pressure during interrogation.

Read more



What are good questions about the death penalty? ›

  • CORE QUESTION. Should the Death Penalty Be Legal?
  • Sentencing Considerations. Does Clemency Serve as a Safeguard in Capital Punishment Sentences? ...
  • Deterrence & Victims. Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime? ...
  • Executions. ...
  • Morality. ...
  • Federal Death Penalty.

What are the 3 best arguments for the death penalty? ›

  • all guilty people deserve to be punished.
  • only guilty people deserve to be punished.
  • guilty people deserve to be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime.

Can the death penalty be effective? ›

A: No, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws.

Why should we favor the death penalty? ›

Justice requires that society impose on criminals losses equal to those they imposed on innocent persons. By inflicting death on those who deliberately inflict death on others, the death penalty ensures justice for all.

How does death penalty affect human rights? ›

Amnesty International holds that the death penalty breaches human rights, in particular the right to life and the right to live free from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Both rights are protected under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN in 1948.

Why does death penalty take so long? ›

A lengthy appeals process causes delays

Sometimes, death sentence appeals go to the nation's highest court to be decided. "The appeals process is taking longer" and that causes the decades of delays before an execution takes place, Dunham said.

Why the death penalty is ethical? ›

To conclude, the death penalty is ethical since it is a form of retribution for the victim of the crime and their families, it deters others from not committing similar crimes, and it reduces the chances of the criminal reoffending.

What crimes get death penalty? ›

Capital punishment is a legal penalty under the criminal justice system of the United States federal government. It can be imposed for treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, or attempted murder of a witness, juror, or court officer in certain cases.

Where is the death penalty legal? ›

Death Penalty States 2022
StateDeath Penalty Law StatusExecutions Since 1976
46 more rows

Can punishment stop the crime? ›

Increasing the severity of punishment does little to deter crime. Laws and policies designed to deter crime by focusing mainly on increasing the severity of punishment are ineffective partly because criminals know little about the sanctions for specific crimes.

Is the death penalty moral? ›

Is capital punishment moral? Capital punishment is often defended on the grounds that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and welfare of its citizens. Murderers threaten this safety and welfare. Only by putting murderers to death can society ensure that convicted killers do not kill again.

Should death penalty be banned? ›

The vast preponderance of the evidence shows that the death penalty is no more effective than imprisonment in deterring murder and that it may even be an incitement to criminal violence. Death-penalty states as a group do not have lower rates of criminal homicide than non-death-penalty states.

Why should the death penalty not be abolished? ›

Proponents of keeping the federal death penalty argue that justice must be carried out to deter crime and offer closure to families, and that the federal government has an obligation to enact the sentences handed down by the courts.

What crimes get the death penalty? ›

Capital punishment is a legal penalty under the criminal justice system of the United States federal government. It can be imposed for treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, or attempted murder of a witness, juror, or court officer in certain cases.

What are the cons of the death penalty? ›

List of the Disadvantages of the Death Penalty
  • It is the ultimate denial of human rights when implemented. ...
  • The death penalty can execute someone who is possible innocent. ...
  • The cost to prosecute the death penalty is much higher than other cases. ...
  • There may not be any deterrence to crime with the death penalty in place.

Is the death penalty cruel? ›

The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.


1. Death Penalty Pros And Cons
2. 25 Strangest Last Meal Requests On Death Row
(Top Trending)
3. Hard Questions: Can you be both pro-life and pro-death penalty?
(Cornerstone Television Network)
4. I Solved The World's Longest Math Problem!
5. 25 Strangest Last Words of Death Row Inmates
(Top Trending)
6. Tiffany Moss reacts as jury recommends death penalty

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Geoffrey Lueilwitz

Last Updated: 09/23/2022

Views: 5305

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Geoffrey Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-03-23

Address: 74183 Thomas Course, Port Micheal, OK 55446-1529

Phone: +13408645881558

Job: Global Representative

Hobby: Sailing, Vehicle restoration, Rowing, Ghost hunting, Scrapbooking, Rugby, Board sports

Introduction: My name is Geoffrey Lueilwitz, I am a zealous, encouraging, sparkling, enchanting, graceful, faithful, nice person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.